The
Forest Around Us |
Comment By Bill Moore |
Big
is beautiful |
....
Is it Mr. Smith? Is big really beautiful when we talk about the big
companies—and I mean the real biggies—in this forest industry
of ours? I’d like to talk about this bigness in an objective way
because bigness is a reality. To understand this forest industry —
and the public in general does not—we should look at this aspect
of the forest around us and develop thoughts on why so big? How big?
And should they be bigger? Or possibly smaller? |
the top mindful of those more industrial peaceful
days when the firm was smaller, life was simpler and the chain of command
was shorter? Remember, chaps? |
beautiful to those in
the room at the top when they look over their house-hold bills that it
takes to sustain these camps. But as the great James Durante said, “That’s
the situation that prevails.” ....And what of these small towns — bunkhouses, cookhouses, family homes and assorted living accom-modations? Is big beautiful for the people who live there? Often the family homes in camps are charged much lower rents than normal for the accommodation. And the single man who eats in a company cookhouse pays the tidy sum of $2.50 per day for food and lodging! Why one T-bone steak eats that up and I’ve seen many a lean young logger tackle three of them at a supper table. Logging camp cookhouses prepare some of the best food in the land. ....Camps have changed drastically over the past decade and the logging people in them expect and should get the amenities of life if they are to produce with skill, keep their pride and live in the remote areas. So for this the company pays a big price for beautiful. I’m sure as the systems for big camps were formed no one in the room at the top ever believed that one day the price of camps would come so high. Big is beautiful.? ....Not necessarily, and I think we shall see a reversal of the big camps—because they could price themselves out of existence. The trend will have to be toward a return of more independent contractors with |
44 | British Columbia Lumberman,
November, 1975 |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (. page break )
smaller camps and smaller problems. Here the chain of command and
costing can be better handled. For a time in the past it seemed as though
the biggies wanted to do nearly all of their own logging, but it would
now seem that they are quite willing to hand over some of their headaches
to a smaller company that can run the job more intimately. Keep out of the bight, ................ |
|
British Columbia Lumberman, November, 1975 |