Bargaining
table warfare – forever?
|
|

fare.
....This bombardment of news about
the upcoming negotiation, strike threats, lock-out threats,
illegal actions, and a multitude of babbles and rumors are quickly picked
up by media and examined, enlarged and exaggerated and leave the readers
or viewers with a pretty despondent feeling about their future. More
and more one hears the talk change during the spring from “What
do you think of the strike situation this summer?” to “How
long will the strike last this summer?” This strike talk is fomented
not just by the labor leaders in their threats to management, but also
by management in its answers to labor.
....I believe we are in bad need of a realization
by both sides that labor negotiations must return to the sanctified
ground in which they belong — a closed room with no press leaks
in the wall. But of course this is being naïve. We really know
that both sides have to keep the pot boiling with bulletins all year
long. In that way they keep the troops aroused and the ulcers working
overtime — in everyone. What a way to live!
....Did it ever occur (sure it did) to
the leaders I spoke of that there are some other items in the daily
living of all of us in this forest industry besides bargaining tables
and ultimatums? Did they ever (sure they have) that they and they alone
could improve the inexcusable fatal and accident rate we have in B.C.’s
logging industry?
....Fifty men or more is the 20 year average
of fatal accidents in our woods. We have men in both labor and management
who spend their lifetimes dedicated to the cause of accident prevention.
But I put it to you
|
....Springtime
— two summers and one winter ahead of us — the sap’s
running in the trees — a logger can get his bones warmed with the
sun — the buds are budding — and it’s time again for
that eighth wonder of the world in B.C. — the negotiation bargaining
table war between these two old friends of the forest around us —
management and labor — Ah Wilderness!
....Perhaps one should not speak lightly
of such a serious and really vital issue as the negotiation for a new
master agreement. I know there are some pretty fine fellows who will spend
months, and days and nights, trying to put a contract together and eventually
they will despite the words — “impossible, irresponsible,
never and possibly, doomed.”
....But really, just how long do a relatively
few people in our society think the majority of people are going to allow
this gamesmanship called management-labor negotiations to continue? I’ve
heard people call it every name under the sun from kid stuff to empire
building, but as one person I respect said of the entire exercise: “Show
us a better way— under the present circumstances.”
....The truth is, there is just no better
way under the present circumstances. And in our industry, and in others,
the circumstances are these: We are living the good times. How long they
will last will depend on the ability of the large nations to avoid depressions
or great wars. And while the good times last, nobody — no politician,
no labor leader or no management leader is apparently going to accept
the only means of “changing the circumstances” — complete
wage and profit control.
....Now there’s a five word phrase
to warm the hearts of labor leaders, board presidents and free enterprise
politicians. It’s one of those phrases that gets talked about a
lot — sort of like Will Rogers’ famed quote: “Everybody
talks about the weather, but nobody ever does anything about
|
|
it.” And really
what is a person to do about it — this monstrosity called labor-management
negotiations? Surely people of the future will look back upon these
times and call us idiots for the manner in which we have allowed this
game of bargaining table warfare to close industry, put people out of
work, cause bitterness amongst our people and totally disrupt our lives
and economy.
....And who is to blame? Well you can get
a good two-bit lecture on the blame from several sources. It just depends
whether you are union, corporation, public or the so called innocent
politician. It is an endless argument and it does not appear that it
will be solved until some future generations deal with the problem and
have the intelligence and daring to solve it.
....Certainly, for starters the name calling
that goes on by both sides has to be considered as not conducive to
sensible discussion or bargaining. When men in authority from management
or labor come out with vindictives such as “bloodsuckers,”
“communists,” “tyrants,” and “pinkos,”
it makes one wonder about the caliber of negotiating ability such people
possess at the table. Not that bargaining table warfare is a polite
little game of tea and crumpets, but does it need to sound like the
next atomic war? I am sure those people of the future, the sons of our
sons, will have a better answer.
....If there are no cures, then possibly
there are ways to ease the strain. I suppose it really narrows down
to a very few persons on the side of management and on the side of labor
who actually have the influence to put things on a better or worse track
for all of us in this forest industry. The heads of about three or four
of the top forestry firms (need I name them?) and the three or four
top presidents of the IWA (if you don’t know their names —
you’re not with it) have, whether they like it or not, the influence
and muscle to bring about an easing of the tensions to this constant
year after year bombardment of bargaining table war-
|
|