|
it will continue to demand
more of what it considers its rightful share of corporate profits. |
|||
..
This is the second in a series of articles on Bill Moore’s recent
tour of the forest industry in Finland. The writer talked to various people,
and conducted a personal study of that country’s forestry operations.
One of the highlights of his talks was the information he garnered on
Finland’s labor-management system, to which he devotes this month’s
column. |
||||
|
||||
“Could
production committee system help us?” |
||||
....I
spoke last month of the production committee system I had encountered
on my recent visit to Finland. This grass roots labor-man-agement program
is used by law in all plants, factories and operations for all industries. |
....This has never materialized nor is
it likely to in the near future. |
|||
24 | British Columbia
Lumberman, November, 1971 |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (. page break )
course we
all know, but between the human frailties of power platforms and disgruntled
individuals we are all swept along in a very fast changing labor-management
world. ....This industry has many logging camps and mills operating today that only need a few incidents of irritation to cause untold trouble and possible work stoppage. ....These irritations can generally be traced to a lack of understanding by a manager or foreman who is not infor-med or who does not act promptly to see that proper corrective measures are taken. ....Time and time again these problems are created. ....This industry is not noted for its over abundance of managers or foremen who have been trained in the psychology of people. ....The old methods of “you , and you, and you, take the boat” were once the order of the day, but now we find in its place a far different atmosphere. OLD TACTICS OUT WANT ANSWERS |
want to know a few answers to his questions. ....Personnel officers or managers are not always the persons he will turn to. Instead he may choose to go to his shop steward or the grievance com-mittee. From there on his questions are in the hands of negotiators and too often the waste of time by all concerned is frustrating. ....Is it naïve to think that at this time in our short industrial life we can find ourselves unable to cope with one another directly? ....I’m sure the first people to applaud some sort of area where so many molehill problems can be answered and solved, before they become mountains, would be the negotiators of management and labor. ....A production committee of equal numbers from management and labor, properly organized, given good terms of reference, and backed by the leaders of management and labor could possibly be of great help to so many of the grass roots problems at camp and plant level. ....Serious thinking would have to be used by both sides in setting up such a committee, and if formed, it is necessary that the minutes of such meetings arrive in the hands of the leaders of both sides. In no way should the rights of unionism be infringed upon by such a committee, for the labor delegates would naturally be union men. ....Management also would not neces-sarily be bound by a committee deci-sion, but if a majority concurred on a given subject, it should be manage-ment’s concern to see that the subject is dealt with. DISCUSS PROBLEMS |
and be effective
for the company as well as the work force? ....If such a thing is impossible then maybe we’d better forget such stale words as democracy or freedom of speech. After all they were coined by silly old fashioned men who only built our nation. ....The above is written for those who are not yet ready to throw in the towel. This forest around us in B.C. is still full of such men, in management and on the work force . ....Think about it. |
||
Keep out of the bight, |